|
| |
WB3JZV's Tracking and Recovery Report
Questions, send them to
ME
and I'll forward them to Paul
Discussion of EOSS#53 Tracking and
Recovery Team Results
The Tracking and Recovery Team performed well during
EOSS#53 with 9 member teams (tactical calls Alpha – India).
- Congrats to the 2 tracking stations that scored one or more bearing
bulls-eyes (zero degree errors): K0CO and WB0MTN.
- N7MXO, Carl, and his partner, Mark joined the hunt for their first time.
Due to antenna problems, they were not able to communicate their bearings. My
partner, Lucas, no call sign, was taking bearings for his first time was
hampered by available equipment.
- The Average Separation in Miles between the GPS and tracking team
fixes for EOSS#53 (5.8 miles) was greater than for EOSS#47 (3.3 miles). These
results are due to an increase in Average Tracker [bearing] Error from
9 to 19 degrees for EOSS#47 and EOSS#53, respectively.
- The Separation in Miles between the GPS and tracking team fixes was
largest for the first Sample Time (23.3 miles). One reason for this is
the tracker bearings crossed each other with acute angles. When bearings cross
at such small angles over a great distance, even small bearing errors can
cause large fix errors. See Worst Performance Chart to see the bearings
and the resulting triangulated points. One way to avoid acute angles for this
case would be to increase the tracker north-south separation distances.
Increase the 22 N-S miles separation for the furthest trackers to 35 miles.
- Large Average Tracking Team Errors may occur when the balloon is
overhead. It is difficult to take an accurate RF bearing when the beacon is
above 45 degrees elevation. Any tracker recognizing the balloon to be overhead
should refrain from providing an RF bearing unless he can aim his DF antenna
upwards and get a trusted bearing.
- The final bearing before LOS is the team's most important.
If GPS fixes become unavailable during descent, the Tracking Team's final fix
will provide the best clue to locating the payload. For EOSS#53, the Tracking
Team's final fix (63.4,21.8) was 6.8 miles from touchdown (68.3,15.9). Only 4
tracking stations of 9 provided bearings for the final sample time. I
recommend a minimum of 75% of the T&R team provide bearings in the future. Of
the 4 stations that provided this data for EOSS#53, 2 of the stations were off
by 20 and 28 degrees.
- It is practical for a 9-member Tracking and Recovery Team to comb an area
of 100 square miles from the Tracking and Recovery Team’s final fix to locate
a beacon. In such a situation, the field coordinator’s direction is vital. If
the Separation in Miles for the final sample time is 10 miles or less,
the team did well. For EOSS#53, the separation was 6.8 miles.
- The best performance for the team happened at the 10:25 Sample Time with
only 0.4 mile difference between the GPS and T&R team fixes. That’s terrific!
See Best Performance Chart.
de Paul, WB3JZV
Excel Analysis
Absolute Bearing Errors in Degrees, by Tracker, by Sample
Time, Based on GPS Fix
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Sample Number==> |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
Tracker |
| |
|
Sample Time==> |
9:40 |
9:55 |
10:10 |
10:25 |
10:35 |
10:45 |
10:52 |
10:57 |
Error |
|
W0CBH |
Benjie |
Alpha |
|
8 |
|
|
8 |
88 |
8 |
20 |
26 |
|
WB0MTN |
Roger |
Bravo |
17 |
3 |
7 |
3 |
2 |
12 |
12 |
0 |
7 |
|
KB0YRZ |
Chris & Ben |
Charlie |
23 |
10 |
|
|
7 |
1 |
18 |
|
12 |
|
N0PUF |
Dan |
Delta |
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
K0CO |
Jack & Rich |
Echo |
4 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
15 |
|
|
4 |
|
KA0ULN |
Russ |
Foxtrot |
18 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
KI0DZ |
Mary-Francis |
Golf |
4 |
1 |
1 |
10 |
13 |
4 |
1 |
4 |
5 |
|
N7MXO |
Carl & Mark |
Hotel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
No-call |
Lucas |
India |
|
35 |
34 |
39 |
40 |
71 |
|
28 |
41 |
|
Average Tracking Team Error at Sample Time==> |
13 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
17 |
32 |
10 |
13 |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tabulated Results of Tracking Team vs GPS Fixes by Sample
Time
|
|
|
Tracking Team Fix==> |
(7.6,60.2) |
(42.5,40.7) |
(46.4,38.2) |
(46.8,27.6) |
(49.3,25.2) |
(55.3,22.1) |
(61.5,17.7) |
(63.4,21.8) |
Average |
|
|
|
GPS Fix==> |
(22.2,42.1) |
(41,39) |
(44.7,35.3) |
(46.6,27.9) |
(50.5,24.8) |
(60.4,20.7) |
(64.7,17.3) |
(67.4,16.2) |
Separa. |
|
|
|
Separation in Miles==> |
23.3 |
2.3 |
3.4 |
0.4 |
1.3 |
5.3 |
3.2 |
6.8 |
5.8 |
|
|
|
|
revised C |
revised C |
|
|
|
|
|
revised gps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Best performance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Worst performance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excel Charts


|